• Home
  • Film Classes
  • Short Films
    • Love is a function of Death
    • usa.DT
    • Banality of Evil
    • 2 Yahoos and a bottle of Rum
    • The Here Between
    • Pale Side of Darkness
    • The Restroom
    • MetA-Romantic
  • Photography
    • 21 Final Candidates for the 7 Wonders of the World >
      • Pyramids of Giza
      • Chichen Itza
      • Machu Picchu
      • Roman Colosseum
      • Neuschwanstein Castle
      • Statue of Liberty
      • Stonehenge
      • Hagia Sophia
      • Acropolis
      • Eiffel Tower
      • Alhambra
      • Christ Redeemer
    • 7 Natural Wonders of the World >
      • Paricutin Volcano
      • Grand Canyon
      • Northern Lights
      • The Harbor of Rio de Janeiro
      • Iguazu Falls
    • Natural Wonders of the U.S.A >
      • The Wave
      • The Racetrack
      • Yellowstone
      • Slot Canyons and more
      • Arches National Park
      • Bryce Canyon
      • Carlsbad Caverns
      • Badlands National Park
      • Canyonlands
    • Abandoned Places
    • Nature +
    • Faces
    • Interesting Places in USA
    • Interesting Places in Europe
  • Film Blog
    • Film Theory >
      • Women in Film Noir
      • Why do we have movie theaters?
      • Film Noir-Movement or Genre
      • How to understand box-office figures
    • Classic Films >
      • Touch of Evil
      • Citizen Kane - Overview
      • Citizen Kane - Firing of Leland
      • Citizen Kane - Declaration of Principles
      • I Am Cuba
      • Grand Illusion
      • Numbers and Language in "A Clockwork Orange"
      • JFK
      • Tout va b!en
      • Rear Window
      • "Vertigo" versus "A Man Escaped"
      • Meaning of 2001: A Space Odyssey
      • The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
      • Network
      • Casablanca
    • Recent Films >
      • "The Matrix," freedom and Alice in Wonderland
      • Sweet and Lowdown
      • Taxi Driver
      • The Weather Underground
      • Lone Star
      • Cotton Club
      • From "Gimme Shelter" to "Spinal Tap"
      • Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
      • Requiem for a Dream
      • The Elephant Man
      • Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
      • Natural Born Killers
    • 21 Century >
      • Gravity
      • Blue is the warmest color
      • Spike Lee and the missing link in his "essential films" list
      • Kon-Tiki
      • The Place Beyond the Pines
      • Searching for Sugar Man
      • Killing them Softly
      • Silver Linings Playbook
      • Drive
      • Midnight in Paris
  • Best Films
    • The Best Films Ever Made
    • Best Noir Films
    • Best Neo-Noir Films
    • Best Comedy Films
    • Best Documentary Films
    • Best Western Films
    • Best Animation Films
    • Best Cinematography
    • Best Science-Fiction films
    • Best Screenwriters
    • Amazing Films
    • Best Film Directors
    • Best Experimental Films
    • Film Genres >
      • Gangster Films
      • Western Films
      • Science Fiction (Sci-Fi) Films
      • Woman's Film
      • Comedy Films
      • Nonfiction Films
      • Animated Films
      • Experimental Films
    • The Motion Picture Production Code
    • Film Quotes
  • Orson Welles
    • Rare pictures from "Citizen Kane"
    • Rare pictures from "The Magnificent Ambersons"
    • Rare Orson Welles pictures, awards and drawings
    • Rare pictures from "The Stranger," "Lady from Shanghai," "Hearts of Darkness," "It's all True," "Macbeth," and "Othello"
    • Rare pictures from Orson Welles Magic Show, Radio career and Theater productions
  • Cinema History
  • Contact
ilianFilm
ilianFIlm

Summary of “The Image of Objectivity” by  Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison

2/7/2020

0 Comments

 
In their article “The Image of Objectivity” Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison examine in detail the images in scientific atlases from the late 19th to early 20th century. Their examination shows two trends. The first one is, the issues connected with the subjective representation of the images that concerned scientists in the 19th century. With several examples, Daston and Galison, show how different scientists dealt with artists who painted the images for their atlases and how the scientists tried to minimize the subjective artistic input. Simultaneously, the article also shows the birth of objectivism from 18th to the 20th century.
When it came to images in their atlases, the main goal scientists had in the late 19th century, was the idea that the images had to be “true to nature.” Scientists wanted to show “typical” images of human bodies or floral species, but scientists had different interpretation of “truth.” During that time there were two dominant ways to show images in scientific atlases – the ideal way and the characteristic way. The ideal way was to portray images that were the perfect representation of the body or organ they wanted to show. Here comes the paradox. The ideal image portrayed, excluded any peculiarity that exists in reality, meaning this image may not exists in real life, even though they claimed it was “true to nature.” So, to show the perfect or ideal body, organ or species the scientists judged and interpreted what was to be included or excluded from their representation of nature. The second approach, the characteristic one, illustrated images that were combination of ideal image and the actual state of the body or the organ they were showing.
The invention of the analog camera and picture taking changed how scientists view the subject of objectivity. The presence of the camera in society rendered all images that were painted by an artist to be called a depiction. Since the camera was a mechanical instrument, scientists viewed the images generated by the new apparatus as more objective, or mechanically objective to be precise. The reasons were few. The first one was the camera can take many identical pictures, so it was a model of standardization. Second, the camera did not interpret the images, it just took them. So, the camera was seen as instrument of authenticity. And third, the camera was present at all times, but it took pictures only when the scientists operated with it, thus the camera was sees as silent observer. To summarize, the images taken with the camera were not only seen as more honest than artistically produced images, but they were seen as mechanically objective, because humans were not involved in re-producing them.
But the camera did not end the objectivity debate because, as it was observed, the images taken by the new technology varied based on few factors. The variation of the images depended on the location of the camera, the x-ray tube or the object. Further, it was noticed that the images taken with the camera might not include all the details presented in the object. By late 19th century, the mechanically taken images changed the burden of objectivity to the reader of the image. This new direction of objectivism was marked by the self-control of the scientists. Meaning, the scientists were trying to manage their own prejudices, but at the same time they were not afraid of moral judgment against their piers. This process grew to a complete mechanical representation of all the body parts and species by the mid 20th century. The images were showing all the imperfections characteristic for the specific object that was photographed.

This shift in objectivism shows the different moral approaches of the time. The scientists from the “truth to nature” period were trying to show the perfect or the ideal image of nature, even though that image may not exist in real life. While the scientists from the period characterized by mechanical
objectivity were required to show what was exact, specific and characteristic of the object they will photographing. Thus, by using mechanical instruments they were showing the real world.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    People who critique moving pictures fall into 3 general classes:

    1.
    Reviewers - are generally journalists who describe the contents and general tone of a movie, with only incidental emphasis on aesthetic evaluation. 

    2.
    Critics - are also journalists for the most part, but their emphasis is more on evaluation than on mere content description. 

    3.
    Theorists - are usually professional academics, often the authors of books on how movies can be studied on a more philosophical level.

    Author

    I'm a film critic and I like to write about films that are exceptional and stand above the rest. 

    Categories

    All
    2011
    2012
    2013
    2014
    Classic
    Recent
    Theory

    RSS Feed

    "The role of the critic is to help people see what is in the work, what is in it that shouldn't be, what is not in it that could be. He is a good critic if he helps people understand more about the work that they could see for themselves; he is a great critic, if by his understandings and feeling for the work, by his passion, he can excite people so that they want to experience more of the art that is there, waiting to be seized. He is not necessarily bad critic if he makes errors in judgement. He is a bad critic if he does not awaken the curiosity, enlarge the interests and understanding of his audience. The art of the critic is to transmit his knowledge of and enthusiasm for art to others." ( Pauline Kael )
Photography
Film Canon
Contact

All materials Copyright © 2022 ilianFIlm - All rights reserved.
No commercial reproduction, adaptation, distribution or transmission of any part or parts of this website or any
information contained therein by any means whatsoever is permitted without prior written permission.



© 2022 ilianFilm.com All Rights Reserved