• Home
  • Night of Deception
  • Short Films
    • A Cloud Holding a Knife
    • Love is a function of Death
    • Banality of Evil
    • 2 Yahoos and a bottle of Rum
    • The Here Between
    • Pale Side of Darkness
    • The Restroom
    • MetA-Romantic
  • Photography
    • 21 Final Candidates for the 7 Wonders of the World >
      • Pyramids of Giza
      • Angkor Wat
      • Chichen Itza
      • Easter Island
      • Machu Picchu
      • Neuschwanstein Castle
      • Eiffel Tower
      • Acropolis
      • Taj Mahal
      • Alhambra
      • Petra
      • Roman Colosseum
      • Statue of Liberty
      • Hagia Sophia
      • Christ Redeemer
      • Stonehenge
    • 7 Natural Wonders of the World >
      • Paricutin Volcano
      • Grand Canyon
      • Northern Lights
      • The Harbor of Rio de Janeiro
      • Iguazu Falls
      • Amazon River
    • Natural Wonders of the U.S.A >
      • The Wave
      • The Racetrack
      • Yellowstone
      • Slot Canyons and more
      • Arches National Park
      • Bryce Canyon
      • Carlsbad Caverns
      • Badlands National Park
      • Canyonlands
    • Abandoned Places
    • Nature +
    • Faces
    • Interesting Places in USA
    • Interesting Places in Europe
  • Film Blog
    • Film Theory >
      • Women in Film Noir
      • Why do we have movie theaters?
      • Film Noir-Movement or Genre
      • How to understand box-office figures
    • Classic Films >
      • Touch of Evil
      • Citizen Kane - Overview
      • Citizen Kane - Firing of Leland
      • Citizen Kane - Declaration of Principles
      • I Am Cuba
      • Grand Illusion
      • Numbers and Language in "A Clockwork Orange"
      • JFK
      • Tout va b!en
      • Rear Window
      • "Vertigo" versus "A Man Escaped"
      • Meaning of 2001: A Space Odyssey
      • The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
      • Network
      • Casablanca
    • Recent Films >
      • "The Matrix," freedom and Alice in Wonderland
      • Sweet and Lowdown
      • Taxi Driver
      • The Weather Underground
      • Lone Star
      • Cotton Club
      • From "Gimme Shelter" to "Spinal Tap"
      • Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
      • Requiem for a Dream
      • The Elephant Man
      • Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
      • Natural Born Killers
    • 21 Century >
      • Gravity
      • Blue is the warmest color
      • Spike Lee and the missing link in his "essential films" list
      • Kon-Tiki
      • The Place Beyond the Pines
      • Searching for Sugar Man
      • Killing them Softly
      • Silver Linings Playbook
      • Drive
      • Midnight in Paris
  • Best Films
    • The Best Films Ever Made
    • Best Noir Films
    • Best Neo-Noir Films
    • Best Comedy Films
    • Best Documentary Films
    • Best Western Films
    • Best Animation Films
    • Best Cinematography
    • Best Science-Fiction films
    • Best Screenwriters
    • Amazing Films
    • Best Film Directors
    • Best Experimental Films
    • Film Genres >
      • Gangster Films
      • Western Films
      • Science Fiction (Sci-Fi) Films
      • Woman's Film
      • Comedy Films
      • Nonfiction Films
      • Animated Films
      • Experimental Films
    • The Motion Picture Production Code
  • Orson Welles
    • Rare pictures from "Citizen Kane"
    • Rare pictures from "The Magnificent Ambersons"
    • Rare Orson Welles pictures, awards and drawings
    • Rare pictures from "The Stranger," "Lady from Shanghai," "Hearts of Darkness," "It's all True," "Macbeth," and "Othello"
    • Rare pictures from Orson Welles Magic Show, Radio career and Theater productions
  • Cinema History
  • Contact
ilianFilm
ilianFIlm

"Poor Things" or what would happen if Frankenstein had a daughter

1/27/2024

0 Comments

 
Poor things
Yorgos Lanthimos always surprises me with his creative mind and strange narratives. I have been a reluctant fan of his since I saw "Dogtooth." "Poor Things" is bizarre and promiscuous at first glance. However, the story is much deeper than it appears. "Poor things" is the reverse story of Frankenstein or maybe a continuation. A continuation possible if Frankenstein lives.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a collection of different humans, an innocent beast that everyone is afraid of. He kills because he is frightened and doesn't know how to react. He kills because he doesn't understand the social norms of a complicated and discriminatory society that rejects him because of the way he looks. He kills because he is innocent. "Poor Things" is the story of Frankenstein's child. I can not imagine any other actor taking the chances of a weird character like Willem Dafoe does. His character physically looks like a summary of different parts. Dafoe's character, Dr. Baxter, is a living experiment. As he points out in a few scenes, his father used him as an object to conduct his experiments. As such, Dr. Baxter is a Frankenstein. Frankenstein that has decided to raise a child in a grownup body.

Emma Stone is one of the finest young actresses in Hollywood. Every time I see her, I remember the marijuana smoking scene with Michael Keaton in "Birdman" and her heartbroken expression after she says, "No, you don't [matter]." Her performance here is equally praiseworthy. As Frankenstein's daughter, she begins as a child trapped in a grownup body. Throughout the narrative, she learns the societal norms and the absurdity of the civilized world. Her physical appearance changes (body posture, walking, and speech) as she gradually "fits" into the world. However, her innocence is disarming and breaks men's hearts. And since men are the ones who rule society, her innocence threatens the social order. Like father, like daughter.

Only two exits out of this situation would please the ruling class. Either Bella, as Frankenstein's daughter, needs to meet her father's fate. Meaning she needs to be devoured by the civilized and unforgiving society. Or, Bella needs to be assimilated into it. Even though Bella succumbs to the pressure of conformity, she doesn't do it obediently. She commits two acts that make her a living martyr. Bella castrates the macho-infested mentality of male chauvinistic contemporaries. And she, openly advocating her past whoring, makes Max (the man that loves her) accept her for the woman she is - brilliant, intelligent, and way ahead of her time.

Bella's love interests bring us to Mark Ruffalo and Duncan Wedderburn, the other male characters enamored with Bella. Grounded in reality and representing normality, Duncan desperately tries to escape it. His sexual hunger and prowess are a symbol of his rebellion against the norms. But even that male rebellion has its limits. When Bella becomes fragrantly promiscuous and uncontrollably mutinous in her innocent acceptance of sexual normalcy, Duncan is beaten at his own game. Not knowing how to control her, Duncan resorts to the age-old chains of marriage. Not understanding that innocence is gullibly predatory and, as such, superior, Duncan crashes in a most mundane way. However, the decent is enhanced by Ruffalo's brilliant performance. Entertaining and funny, Mark Ruffalo portrays the childish patriarchy of his character, Duncan, with gusto.

This whole package of director and performers wraps up "Poor Things" as one of the most provocative films I have seen and one of the year's best films.


4 / 5
Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
Starring: Emma Stone, Mark Ruffalo, Willem Defoe

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    People who critique moving pictures fall into 3 general classes:

    1.
    Reviewers - are generally journalists who describe the contents and general tone of a movie, with only incidental emphasis on aesthetic evaluation. 

    2.
    Critics - are also journalists for the most part, but their emphasis is more on evaluation than on mere content description. 

    3.
    Theorists - are usually professional academics, often the authors of books on how movies can be studied on a more philosophical level.

    Author

    I'm a film critic and I like to write about films that are exceptional and stand above the rest. 

    Categories

    All
    2011
    2012
    2013
    2014
    Classic
    Recent
    Theory

    RSS Feed

    "The role of the critic is to help people see what is in the work, what is in it that shouldn't be, what is not in it that could be. He is a good critic if he helps people understand more about the work that they could see for themselves; he is a great critic, if by his understandings and feeling for the work, by his passion, he can excite people so that they want to experience more of the art that is there, waiting to be seized. He is not necessarily bad critic if he makes errors in judgement. He is a bad critic if he does not awaken the curiosity, enlarge the interests and understanding of his audience. The art of the critic is to transmit his knowledge of and enthusiasm for art to others." ( Pauline Kael )
Photography
Best Films
Contact

All materials Copyright © 2026 ilianFIlm - All rights reserved.
No commercial reproduction, adaptation, distribution or transmission of any part or parts of this website or any
information contained therein by any means whatsoever is permitted without prior written permission.


© 2010 - 2026 ilianFilm
All Rights Reserved