• Home
  • Film Classes
  • Short Films
    • Love is a function of Death
    • usa.DT
    • Banality of Evil
    • 2 Yahoos and a bottle of Rum
    • The Here Between
    • Pale Side of Darkness
    • The Restroom
    • MetA-Romantic
  • Photography
    • 21 Final Candidates for the 7 Wonders of the World >
      • Pyramids of Giza
      • Chichen Itza
      • Machu Picchu
      • Roman Colosseum
      • Neuschwanstein Castle
      • Statue of Liberty
      • Stonehenge
      • Hagia Sophia
      • Acropolis
      • Eiffel Tower
      • Alhambra
      • Christ Redeemer
    • 7 Natural Wonders of the World >
      • Paricutin Volcano
      • Grand Canyon
      • Northern Lights
      • The Harbor of Rio de Janeiro
      • Iguazu Falls
    • Natural Wonders of the U.S.A >
      • The Wave
      • The Racetrack
      • Yellowstone
      • Slot Canyons and more
      • Arches National Park
      • Bryce Canyon
      • Carlsbad Caverns
      • Badlands National Park
      • Canyonlands
    • Abandoned Places
    • Nature +
    • Faces
    • Interesting Places in USA
    • Interesting Places in Europe
  • Film Blog
    • Film Theory >
      • Women in Film Noir
      • Why do we have movie theaters?
      • Film Noir-Movement or Genre
      • How to understand box-office figures
    • Classic Films >
      • Touch of Evil
      • Citizen Kane - Overview
      • Citizen Kane - Firing of Leland
      • Citizen Kane - Declaration of Principles
      • I Am Cuba
      • Grand Illusion
      • Numbers and Language in "A Clockwork Orange"
      • JFK
      • Tout va b!en
      • Rear Window
      • "Vertigo" versus "A Man Escaped"
      • Meaning of 2001: A Space Odyssey
      • The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
      • Network
      • Casablanca
    • Recent Films >
      • "The Matrix," freedom and Alice in Wonderland
      • Sweet and Lowdown
      • Taxi Driver
      • The Weather Underground
      • Lone Star
      • Cotton Club
      • From "Gimme Shelter" to "Spinal Tap"
      • Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
      • Requiem for a Dream
      • The Elephant Man
      • Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
      • Natural Born Killers
    • 21 Century >
      • Gravity
      • Blue is the warmest color
      • Spike Lee and the missing link in his "essential films" list
      • Kon-Tiki
      • The Place Beyond the Pines
      • Searching for Sugar Man
      • Killing them Softly
      • Silver Linings Playbook
      • Drive
      • Midnight in Paris
  • Best Films
    • The Best Films Ever Made
    • Best Noir Films
    • Best Neo-Noir Films
    • Best Comedy Films
    • Best Documentary Films
    • Best Western Films
    • Best Animation Films
    • Best Cinematography
    • Best Science-Fiction films
    • Best Screenwriters
    • Amazing Films
    • Best Film Directors
    • Best Experimental Films
    • Film Genres >
      • Gangster Films
      • Western Films
      • Science Fiction (Sci-Fi) Films
      • Woman's Film
      • Comedy Films
      • Nonfiction Films
      • Animated Films
      • Experimental Films
    • The Motion Picture Production Code
    • Film Quotes
  • Orson Welles
    • Rare pictures from "Citizen Kane"
    • Rare pictures from "The Magnificent Ambersons"
    • Rare Orson Welles pictures, awards and drawings
    • Rare pictures from "The Stranger," "Lady from Shanghai," "Hearts of Darkness," "It's all True," "Macbeth," and "Othello"
    • Rare pictures from Orson Welles Magic Show, Radio career and Theater productions
  • Cinema History
  • Contact
ilianFilm
ilianFIlm

Triangle of Sadness

10/10/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Ruben Ostlund continues his exploration of weird and uncomfortable situations in the upper classes of society in this well crafted film. It's entertaining to see the reversal of the roles people assume when a situation changes, but Triangle of Sadness is not about that alone. Don't misunderstand me, of course that is part of the plot, but I believe that message is entirely different.
The film start with entertaining scene that exposes the shallow world of male modeling. Here we are presented with the observation that if the fashion brand name is more expensive then the strategy of the brand is looking down on its customers. If the brand is meant to be purchased by the middle/low classes then the advertisement is more friendly. Obviously that statement applies to the whole of society not just to the fashion industry.

During the second segment of the film this idea of separation between lower and higher is taken further by the Captain of the boat and the Russian millionaire. In an interesting exchange of quotes by famous people both of them state what the film is about - the entrapment of the individual in the dysfunctional political systems. Both of the characters expose the shortcomings of the dominating societal systems underlining the conundrum of the contemporary individual in general. In particular, contemporary societies are facilitating between communist or capitalist systems but both of. them are not perfect. One of them us utopia of choices, the other one is dystopia of limitations.

The third part of the film takes place on an island. Here the sterileness of the communist ideology is unraveled. Communism is not possible as an alternative to the human condition because it's not practical. The reason being: human nature. Individuals want to be recognized for their abilities and the qualities and knowledge they have compared to their peers. This drive eventually leads to desire for power and/or greed.

Therefore, the first segment of the film depicting the fashion world exposes the teeth of capitalism. The last segment of the film depicting the island survival exposes the root canal of communism (to stay with the dental analogy). The first sequence shows that capitalism has a tunnel vision focusing on dollar/euro sign. The last sequence shows that communism has a tunnel vision enhanced by the complete misunderstanding of human nature.

As such, these are the two parts of the triangle of sadness leaving the individual to be the third angle. The middle/yacht segment of the film shows humans trapped in between two entities. Trapped in between both political systems, tapped in their societal roles, and most importantly trapped in unhappiness not knowing how to escape it.

Now the downside. Regardless of the profound message the film felt episodic. The presence of the two main actors in all three parts did not feel sufficient enough to form a cohesive whole of connected sequences. The breaking down of the film into parts enhanced that feeling.

Another area that the film could have done better in is cinematography. Digital cinematography can feel cartoonist, which Triangle of Sadness escaped for most of the time. However, the film felt stale. One can argue that this is intentional and represents the staleness of the above discussed political situations. I don't think is that easy. I saw only one moving shot - Paula walking in the yacht hallway towards the captain's cabin. This shot felt so alive compare to the rest of the film that it stood out right away and engage me in participation. I wished that contemporary filmmakers with designated budget utilize the technologies available to them and don't take the easy way out. The presence of moving camera will enhance audience engagement and please film buffs.

Regardless of these two points the film is worth seeing.

3.5/5
Director: Ruben Ostlund
Starring: Charlbi Dean, Harris Dickinson, Dolly De Leon, Vicki Berlin

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    People who critique moving pictures fall into 3 general classes:

    1.
    Reviewers - are generally journalists who describe the contents and general tone of a movie, with only incidental emphasis on aesthetic evaluation. 

    2.
    Critics - are also journalists for the most part, but their emphasis is more on evaluation than on mere content description. 

    3.
    Theorists - are usually professional academics, often the authors of books on how movies can be studied on a more philosophical level.

    Author

    I'm a film critic and I like to write about films that are exceptional and stand above the rest. 

    Categories

    All
    2011
    2012
    2013
    2014
    Classic
    Recent
    Theory

    RSS Feed

    "The role of the critic is to help people see what is in the work, what is in it that shouldn't be, what is not in it that could be. He is a good critic if he helps people understand more about the work that they could see for themselves; he is a great critic, if by his understandings and feeling for the work, by his passion, he can excite people so that they want to experience more of the art that is there, waiting to be seized. He is not necessarily bad critic if he makes errors in judgement. He is a bad critic if he does not awaken the curiosity, enlarge the interests and understanding of his audience. The art of the critic is to transmit his knowledge of and enthusiasm for art to others." ( Pauline Kael )
Photography
Film Canon
Contact

All materials Copyright © 2022 ilianFIlm - All rights reserved.
No commercial reproduction, adaptation, distribution or transmission of any part or parts of this website or any
information contained therein by any means whatsoever is permitted without prior written permission.



© 2022 ilianFilm.com All Rights Reserved